Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1349

reference
932-tree-1
name
1349
tree-preservation-order

undefined

932-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032747 50.876944)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032633 50.876932,-1.032639 50.876954,-1.032654 50.876974,-1.032679 50.876990,-1.032711 50.877001,-1.032746 50.877005,-1.032781 50.877002,-1.032813 50.876992,-1.032838 50.876976,-1.032855 50.876956,-1.032861 50.876934,-1.032856 50.876912,-1.032840 50.876891,-1.032815 50.876875,-1.032784 50.876865,-1.032749 50.876861,-1.032713 50.876864,-1.032681 50.876874,-1.032656 50.876890,-1.032639 50.876910,-1.032633 50.876932)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL